CarComparison home

Compare cars on reliability and running costs, and check any car by its reg

Used Ford Kuga Mk2 (2012–19) vs Kia Sportage Mk4 QL (2016–21)

Figures updated

Shopping for a used family suv? We compare the Ford Kuga Mk2 (2012–2019) and Kia Sportage Mk4 QL (2016–2021), which were on sale at the same time, on size, boot space, performance, safety and running costs, plus how cars of their age do in real MOT tests.

Change cars or mileage

The short answer

Pick the Ford Kuga Mk2 for the better MOT record, or the Kia Sportage Mk4 QL for the bigger boot.

FigureFord Kuga Mk2Mk2 (2012–2019), 5-door SUVKia Sportage Mk4 QLMk4 QL (2016–2021), 5-door SUV
Price and practicality
Body5-door SUV5-door SUV
Seats55
BootSeats up / folded406 litres / 1,603491 litres / 1,480 (best)
Length4,531mm4,485mm
WidthWithout mirrors1,838mm1,855mm
Height1,689mm1,635mm
Performance
Power120–182 PS115–185 PS
0–62mph9.2–13.4 sec9.1–12.0 sec
Safety
Euro NCAP ratingTests get tougher each year★★★★★ (2012)★★★★★ (2015)
Economy and emissions
Fuel typesDiesel–
Official economyVersions of this generation37.2–60.1 mpg–
CO2123–198 g/km–
Running costs at 7,500 miles a year
Diesel198.4p a litre£1,534 (44.1 mpg)–
Cheapest version to fuelWhichever fuel costs least£1,534 (diesel)–
Car tax, registered 2001 to 2017Taxed on CO2; newer cars pay a flat £200£35 to £760–
Reliability from real MOT tests
Reliability score116Well above average (best)99Average
Failed first time, cars of this generation's ageUK rate for cars the same age in brackets20.7% (23.5%)built 2012–2019 (best)19.0% (18.6%)built 2016–2021
Failed MOT first time (ages 3–20)20.8% (best)24.3%
Failed at 3 years old9.6% (best)15.7%
Failed at 5 years old15.3% (best)17.1%
Failed at 10 years old27.2% (best)33.0%
Most common MOT faultBrake pads (2.9% of tests)Brake pads (3.6% of tests)
Fails more than average onNothing stands outBrakes (1.7×), Steering (1.6×)
MOT tests analysed282,268258,990
About the cars
TypeFamily SUVFamily SUV
Owners' average miles a year8,6008,600
On sale2012–20192016–2021

Green marks the better figure where the difference is more than 3%. Reliability figures cover every version of each model tested in the year. Running costs use the typical official economy of recent versions (WLTP where available); real-world economy is usually a little worse for every car.

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

›Is a used Ford Kuga Mk2 or Kia Sportage Mk4 QL more reliable?

The Ford Kuga Mk2. Compared with all cars the same age, the Ford Kuga Mk2 fails its MOT 12% less often than average and the Kia Sportage Mk4 QL about as often as average (DVSA MOT tests, 2024). Because they're different ages, their raw rates differ: 20.7% of Ford Kugas built 2012–2019 failed first time, and 19.0% of Kia Sportages built 2016–2021. Whatever you buy, check the MOT history of the exact car.

›Which is bigger, the Ford Kuga Mk2 or the Kia Sportage Mk4 QL?

The Ford Kuga Mk2 is 46mm longer (4,531mm against 4,485mm). The Kia Sportage Mk4 QL has the bigger boot: 491 litres against 406.

›Which is safer, the Ford Kuga Mk2 or the Kia Sportage Mk4 QL?

Euro NCAP gave the Ford Kuga Mk2 5 stars (2012) and the Kia Sportage Mk4 QL 5 stars (2015). Euro NCAP makes its tests tougher every few years, so ratings from different years aren't directly comparable.

›Should I buy the Ford Kuga Mk2 or the Kia Sportage Mk4 QL?

Pick the Ford Kuga Mk2 for the better MOT record, or the Kia Sportage Mk4 QL for the bigger boot. The comparison above sets out price, space, performance, safety, running costs and reliability side by side.

Sources: manufacturers' UK specifications and price lists and Euro NCAP (listed on each model's page); DVSA anonymised MOT tests 2024 (Open Government Licence v3.0); Vehicle Certification Agency car fuel data, © Crown copyright, VCA cannot accept liability for its accuracy; fuel prices from the GOV.UK Fuel Finder scheme. Photos from Wikimedia Commons, credited under each picture.