Nissan Juke vs Ford Puma
Figures updated
The Nissan Juke and Ford Puma are two of the UK's most popular small SUVs. We compare the Mk2 F16 (2019–) Juke and the Mk2 crossover (2019–) Puma on price, size, boot space, performance, safety and running costs, plus how reliable each has been across 352,777 real MOT tests.
The short answer
Pick the Nissan Juke for the lower price, or the Ford Puma for the bigger boot, the better MOT record, lower fuel costs and more performance.
- The Nissan Juke is the cheapest to buy new: from £24,430, £2,715 less than the Ford Puma.
- The Ford Puma has the biggest boot: 456 litres, 34 more than the Nissan Juke.
- Euro NCAP safety: Nissan Juke 5 stars (2019), Ford Puma 4 stars (2022). Ratings from different years aren't directly comparable, as the tests get tougher.
- The Ford Puma has the better MOT record. Like for like on age and mileage, the Nissan Juke fails its MOT about 81% more often.
- The Ford Puma is the cheapest to fuel: comparing petrol versions, about £84 a year less than the Nissan Juke at 7,500 miles a year.
- Watch the steering on a Nissan Juke: it fails on them 3.7 times as often as the average car.
| Figure | Nissan JukeMk2 F16 (2019–), 5-door SUV | Ford PumaMk2 crossover (2019–), 5-door crossover SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Price and practicality | ||
| Price newUK list prices, across the range | £24,430 to £32,340September 2026 price list (best) | £27,145 to £35,500August 2026 price list |
| Body | 5-door SUV | 5-door crossover SUV |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| BootSeats up / folded | 422 litres / 1,305 | 456 litres / 1,216 (best) |
| Length | 4,210mm | 4,226mm |
| WidthWithout mirrors | 1,800mm | – |
| Height | 1,593mm | 1,550mm |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 114–143 PS | 125–170 PS (best) |
| 0–62mph | 10.1–11.8 sec | 7.4–9.8 sec (best) |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP ratingTests get tougher each year | ★★★★★ (2019) | ★★★★★ (2022) |
| Economy and emissions | ||
| Fuel types | Petrol | Hybrid, Petrol |
| Official economyVersions of this generation | 44.8–47.9 mpg | 41.5–54.3 mpg |
| CO2 | 134–142 g/km | 119–155 g/km |
| Running costs at 7,500 miles a year | ||
| Petrol or hybrid171.7p a litre, today's UK average | £1,264 (46.3 mpg) | £1,180 (49.6 mpg) (best) |
| Cheapest version to fuelWhichever fuel costs least | £1,264 (petrol) | £1,180 (petrol) |
| Car tax a yearCars registered from April 2017 | £200 | £200 |
| Reliability from real MOT tests | ||
| Reliability score | 81Well below average | 147Well above average (best) |
| Failed MOT first time (ages 3–20) | 30.8% | 8.1% (best) |
| Failed at 3 years old | 10.6% | 7.7% (best) |
| Failed at 5 years old | 16.3% | – |
| Failed at 10 years old | 42.9% | – |
| Most common MOT fault | Ball joint (7.9% of tests) | Condition (1.3% of tests) |
| Fails more than average on | Steering (3.7×), Suspension (1.8×) | Nothing stands out |
| MOT tests analysed | 307,145 | 45,632 |
| About the cars | ||
| Type | Small SUV | Small SUV |
| Owners' average miles a year | 7,400 | 7,800 |
| On sale | 2019 on | 2019 on |
Green marks the better figure where the difference is more than 3%. Reliability figures cover every version of each model tested in the year. Running costs use the typical official economy of recent versions (WLTP where available); real-world economy is usually a little worse for every car.
More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
›Is the Nissan Juke or the Ford Puma more reliable?
The Ford Puma. Like for like on age and mileage, the Nissan Juke fails its MOT about 81% more often (reliability scores 147 and 81, where 100 is average). 8.1% of Ford Pumas and 30.8% of Nissan Jukes failed first time in 2024.
›Which is bigger, the Nissan Juke or the Ford Puma?
They're almost the same length (4,210mm and 4,226mm). The Ford Puma has the bigger boot: 456 litres against 422.
›Which is cheaper to buy, the Nissan Juke or the Ford Puma?
The Nissan Juke: new prices start at £24,430, £2,715 less than the Ford Puma (from £27,145). These are manufacturer list prices; dealers and brokers often sell for less.
›Which is cheaper to run, the Nissan Juke or the Ford Puma?
Comparing petrol versions, the Ford Puma costs about £84 a year less to fuel at 7,500 miles (£1,180 against £1,264), using typical official economy and current UK average fuel prices.
›Which is safer, the Nissan Juke or the Ford Puma?
Euro NCAP gave the Nissan Juke 5 stars (2019) and the Ford Puma 4 stars (2022). Euro NCAP makes its tests tougher every few years, so ratings from different years aren't directly comparable.
›Should I buy the Nissan Juke or the Ford Puma?
Pick the Nissan Juke for the lower price, or the Ford Puma for the bigger boot, the better MOT record, lower fuel costs and more performance. The comparison above sets out price, space, performance, safety, running costs and reliability side by side.
Sources: manufacturers' UK specifications and price lists and Euro NCAP (listed on each model's page); DVSA anonymised MOT tests 2024 (Open Government Licence v3.0); Vehicle Certification Agency car fuel data, © Crown copyright, VCA cannot accept liability for its accuracy; fuel prices from the GOV.UK Fuel Finder scheme. Photos from Wikimedia Commons, credited under each picture.